Unit 4 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Unit 4 - Assignment Example It is not appropriate to use the personality tests as a main factor of job consideration, since many errors accompany the personality tests. Response distortion among the applicants is common as they align themselves with the best descriptive words that will win the hearts of the employer. The respondent can also be at a state of low mood at examination time hence the bias. It is worth noting that many people are dynamic and hence express different facets of personality. In addition to that, it is not appropriate to use these tests for the disabled people. Some occupations also do not require personality screening. The Americans with Disability Act outlines that people known to have psychiatric conditions should be exempted for the people with mental illnesses. The examinations should have a relation with the job opportunity at stake (Morgeson et al.). It is justifiable to use clinical personality tests for highly sensitive occupations such as cabin crews and police officers. The tests are likely to cause generally negative public relations feelings. The tools are excellent as they allow one to excavate deeply into a person’s perception about a specific job. However, the tests they should not receive excess overreliance from the employee as they only reflect a tip of iceberg regarding the personality. Taylor, Shannon G., and Donald H. Kluemper. â€Å"Linking Perceptions of Role Stress and Incivility to Workplace Aggression: The Moderating Role of Personality.† Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 2012 :

Academic Performance and Personal Growth and Development Essay

Academic Performance and Personal Growth and Development - Essay Example The purpose and goal of any educational institution are to introduce and instal a set of knowledge and skills to the students and together with the parents and/or guardians act as the custodians of personal development through discovering and nurturing talents. A given education institutions will have students from all economic, social and cultural divides; students talented differently, with different perspectives on the education and learning systems and with different post-school aspirations, and it’s the work of the institution and relevant stakeholders (Joyce, 2011) to match these traits to help them achieve maximum in school life. These students may explicitly and/or implicitly depict or showcase their attributes in that some are physically active in both the academic and extra curriculum activities whereas others may be passive in any of them or both (Rayner & Cools, 2011). This will in one way or the other influence their academic performance and personal growth and de velopment both at the college and after college which is similar but different to some extent and this paper seeks to contrast the academic performance, leadership/ administrative roles and post-school lives of active and passive students. Apart from ensuring students cognitively understand the subject matter; institutions are also interested to ensure that graduates can make good leaders, an attributed nurtured within the institution. Active students tend are involved in leadership roles to a greater extent than the passive students but comparatively lack administrative skills; a factor that can be attributed to rationality and perceptions between these students (Scherer, 2010).